No open Scam Watch flags
No unresolved counterfeit, non-delivery, or COA-forgery reports on file. 2026-08-23: OFFENDING COPY UNCHANGED — no_health_claims HOLDS AT FAIL on first-hand /shop/ read: 'BPC-157 Throat Spray', full nasal-spray line, oral tablets ('250mcg/Tablet'), 'The PSPen' at /product/peptide-injection-pen/, EasyTouch insulin syringes, and outcome-named bundles ('Turn Back Time', 'Shred Express', 'Gut Revival', 'To Be Reborn'); image alt text includes 'anti-aging peptide research kit'. The human-dosage-form prong remains triggered in full. NEW: no_scam_flags MOVES PASS -> PENDING on a search-surfaced Trustpilot complaint describing a $900+ order where a UPS label was created but never shipped and the company stopped responding — SINGLE report, date unverified (the Trustpilot page would not render on direct fetch), so pending not fail; verify next run. /terms/ not re-fetched; reship pass carried on the 08-07 first-hand read. || PRIOR: 2026-08-07: reship_policy QUESTION CLOSED - the /terms/ page was opened directly and the policy is not merely present, it is the most specific refund term in the directory. Page 'Last Updated: May 17, 2026'. Verbatim: 3-day window for defective/broken/missing on photo+video evidence with 'complimentary express shipping' on the exchange; 'we guarantee that we will pack and ship your product within 7 business days'; free UPS 2nd Day Air over $200. The standout term: 'If you choose to do a 3rd party lab test on your order and the lab test shows a negative result for what we advertised, if a different product was in the vial, or if the HPLC purity was below 80%, we will provide a full refund... and will pay for the cost of the 3rd party lab test' - 30-day window. A vendor underwriting independent testing against itself is a genuinely strong signal and is recorded in its favour. Yesterday's concern ('no standalone shipping/refund page found in the footer') was a NAVIGATION artefact, not a policy gap - the terms live under 'Terms & Conditions', not a 'Shipping' link. reship_policy stays PASS, now on first-hand evidence rather than the record. COUNTERWEIGHT TO THE STANDING no_health_claims FAIL, recorded because a fair review must state it: the same page carries the most restrictive purchase gating found anywhere in this directory - mandatory account creation with 'Guest checkout, express checkout, accelerated wallet checkout, and any one-click or bypass checkout path are prohibited'; a required electronic signature and 'Field of Qualified Research'; 21+ adult signature on first orders; and an explicit screening right to 'reject orders associated with pharmacies, med spas, weight-loss clinics, TRT clinics, gyms, dormitories'. The SMS terms state 'PSPeptides does not use SMS to provide dosing advice, protocol guidance, or personal-use product recommendations.' NO CHECK MOVES ON THIS. The no_health_claims FAIL rests on product ARCHITECTURE - oral tablets with per-tablet dosing units, a throat spray, and the PSPen injection pen - and a terms page cannot cure a dosage form. But the gating language is real evidence of intent and Frank should weigh it when he sets the intended-use standard. Telegram/TikTok/Discord and the affiliate program are unchanged. Copyright reads 2026, correctly. || PRIOR: 2026-08-06: no_health_claims FAIL SUBSTANTIALLY CORROBORATED on a first-hand read - the basis is now much broader than the peptide calculator, and this is the clearest intended-use problem in the directory outside the FDA-documented candidates. The product line itself asserts HUMAN ROUTES OF ADMINISTRATION AND PER-UNIT DOSES: 'BPC-157 Throat Spray $59.99'; an 'Oral Peptides' category including 'NAD+ Tablets - 500mg/Tablet' and 'BPC-157 Tablets - 250mcg/Tablet'; 'The PSPen(TM)' injection pen; 'Peptide Pen Tips - 31G 8mm' and insulin syringes. A throat spray, per-tablet dosing units, and an injection pen are not in-vitro formats. Alongside these: the /peptide-calculator/ already on file, an affiliate program, a Telegram channel (t.me/pspeptides) and a Discord. Read together, the storefront's objective intended use reads consumer, not laboratory - which is exactly the 21 CFR 801.4 analysis the FDA applied in the December 2024 letters. STATUS DELIBERATELY HELD AT MONITORING, not escalated to flag-candidate: the check is already at FAIL and is already visible; escalation is a publication decision and belongs to Frank. NOTE FOR CONSISTENCY: the oral dosage-form issue now appears on American Peptides too (Melts(TM) dissolving strips) and the calculator on BioLongevity Labs. All three must be scored the same way, whichever way Frank decides. RUO framing itself still passes - 'For research and laboratory use only. Not for human or animal consumption... sold solely to qualified professionals and organizations for lawful in-vitro research use' - which is precisely the tension the FDA letters address: a compliant disclaimer does not survive a non-compliant product format. Per-vial pricing is clear (Retatrutide (1 Vial) $39.99-$139.99; free UPS 2nd Day Air over $200). ONE DISCREPANCY TO RE-CHECK, NOT SCORED: this run could not find a standalone shipping/reship/refund policy page in the footer (only Terms & Conditions, Order Tracking and 'Verify Order'), yet reship_policy is on file as PASS from an earlier verification. reship_policy is LEFT AT PASS rather than downgraded on a single read; one targeted look at the footer settles it. coa_documentation stays PASS on the /certifications/ page, though no lot-searchable public library was seen. || PRIOR: 2026-08-04: UNFROZEN. The 2026-08-03 report claimed this file's contents were crossed with protide-health.json and froze both, warning that this file's no_health_claims FAIL might belong to the other vendor. That claim is RETRACTED and the FAIL is confirmed to belong HERE. Verified this run: PSPeptides operates pspeptides.com/peptide-calculator/ (enter peptide amount and BAC water volume, returns dose volume and syringe units to draw) and offers a free virtual consultation covering 'reconstitution, dosing protocols, or which peptides are right for your goals.' That is the dosing-calculator-plus-goal-based-consult pattern the fail was written against, confirmed against the vendor's own URLs. No status or check state was altered. Substance unchanged: no_health_claims remains FAIL on the dosing calculator, goal-based consults, outcome-named bundles and homepage testimonial. Trustpilot sentiment is strongly positiv